Governance as the Hidden Battleground: Why RPA Experts Are Wrong About Agentic AI's Real Value in 2025
Key Takeaways
- The core mistake is viewing Agentic AI as a faster bot for task automation. Its real value lies in autonomous decision-making and generating high-quality business outcomes, not process speed.
- The primary challenge for 2025 isn't building more agents, but governing their decisions. This requires new frameworks for liability, ethical guardrails, and risk management that traditional RPA governance can't handle.
- Companies must pivot from a process-focused Center of Excellence to a decision-focused Council of Ethics & Oversight and begin piloting agents with a "human-in-the-loop" model to manage this new paradigm.
Here’s a number that should make every RPA lead's blood run cold: by 2028, a third of all enterprise software will have agentic AI capabilities embedded within it. In 2023, that number was practically zero.
I’ve been watching the automation space for years, and I’ve seen RPA experts rightfully celebrate their wins in wringing efficiency out of rigid, predictable processes. They are masters of a digital kingdom built on rules, scripts, and absolute control. But that kingdom’s walls are about to be breached, and the very philosophy that made them successful is now their greatest liability.
They're looking at Agentic AI and seeing a better, faster bot. They are dangerously wrong. The real value—and the real fight—for Agentic AI in 2025 has almost nothing to do with automating tasks. It's about governing decisions.
The RPA Paradox: Masters of a Fading Kingdom?
I get it. If your entire career has been built on optimizing workflows, measuring success in seconds shaved off a task, and ensuring 100% compliance with a predefined script, then the chaotic potential of an autonomous agent seems like a threat. The metrics that crowned RPA as the king of enterprise automation are now a trap, blinding its experts to the paradigm shift already underway.
Why the metrics that made RPA successful are a trap for Agentic AI.
The success of an RPA bot is measured by its speed, accuracy, and unwavering adherence to a script. It’s a perfect soldier. But an AI agent isn't a soldier; it's a strategist; measuring it on task completion speed is like judging a grandmaster of chess on how fast they can move the pieces.
The Core Misconception: Confusing Task Automation with Autonomous Agency
At the heart of this disconnect is a fundamental misunderstanding of what Agentic AI actually is. I've had countless conversations where people use "AI automation" and "agentic AI" interchangeably. Let me be clear: they are worlds apart.
What RPA Got Right: The Gospel of Predictability and Control
RPA is brilliant at what it does. It takes a high-volume, repetitive, rule-based task and executes it flawlessly, millions of times over.
Its value is rooted in deterministic execution. You give it a map, and it will follow that map perfectly, every single time. Governance is simple: did the bot follow the map? Yes? Great. No? Fix the script.
Where Agentic AI Breaks the Mold: From 'Do This' to 'Figure This Out'
Agentic AI operates on a completely different premise. You don’t give it a map; you give it a destination.
Instead of "click here, copy this, paste there," you say, "monitor our supply chain for disruptions and optimize logistics to maintain a 95% on-time delivery rate." The agent then has to perceive its environment (market data, weather reports, vendor APIs), reason about the best course of action, and act autonomously. It plans, adapts, and executes without constant human prompting.
The Efficiency Trap: Why optimizing for 'bots' is the wrong KPI for 'agents'.
This is where the RPA mindset fails. RPA experts are obsessed with process efficiency. But an AI agent's value isn't in how fast it completes a task, but in the quality of the outcomes it generates.
Did it prevent a costly supply chain disruption? Did it identify a new sales trend and adjust the marketing campaign in real-time? These aren't metrics you can capture with a stopwatch.
This obsession with task-level metrics is a classic case of what I've called Outcome Fine-Tuning Over Technical Metrics – optimizing for the process instead of the actual business result.
The Real Battleground for 2025: Governing Autonomous Decisions, Not Scripts
If the value isn't in the task, then where is it? It's in successfully managing the risk and reward of autonomous decision-making. This is the hidden battleground where the real winners and losers will be decided.
The 'Black Box' Problem on Steroids: Who is liable when an agent makes a bad call?
We've talked about the "black box" of AI for years, but agentic systems take this to a whole new level. When a financial agent autonomously reallocates a multi-million dollar portfolio based on its analysis and it goes wrong, who is responsible?
Is it the developer, the company that deployed it, or the data source it used? Traditional RPA governance has no answer for this, because its scripts don't make novel decisions.
Defining Digital Guardrails: Establishing operational boundaries, ethical rules, and escalation paths.
The crucial work for 2025 isn't building more agents; it's building the fences for them to operate within. This means defining their operational scope, setting hard-coded ethical boundaries, and creating clear escalation paths for when the agent encounters a scenario it can't solve. Governance shifts from auditing a script to curating a decision-making framework.
From CoE (Center of Excellence) to a Council of Ethics & Oversight.
The traditional RPA Center of Excellence, staffed with process engineers, is woefully unequipped for this challenge. Organizations need a new body—a Council of Ethics & Oversight—comprising ethicists, legal experts, data scientists, and business leaders. Their job isn't to approve bots; it's to debate and ratify the operational and ethical boundaries of your autonomous digital workforce.
A Practical Framework: How to Pivot Your Governance for an Agentic Future
This all sounds daunting, but the pivot can start now. It’s about shifting your thinking from control to cultivation.
Step 1: Audit for Autonomy - Identify processes ripe for agency, not just automation.
Look at your business processes not through the lens of "what is repetitive?" but "where is complex decision-making a bottleneck?" Think supply chain optimization, dynamic ad budget allocation, or proactive customer issue resolution. These are the areas where agency provides exponential value over simple automation.
Step 2: Develop a 'Decision Log' Standard - Making agentic reasoning transparent and auditable.
To combat the "black box" problem, mandate that every agent maintains a human-readable log of its reasoning. Why did it choose to re-route that shipment? What data points led it to flag a transaction as fraudulent? This audit trail is non-negotiable for liability, debugging, and building trust.
Step 3: Pilot with a 'Human-in-the-Loop' Governance Model.
Don't go from zero to full autonomy overnight. Start with a model where the agent proposes an action, and a human approves it. This allows you to validate the agent's reasoning and fine-tune its guardrails in a controlled environment.
This is also where governance gets real. You're not just monitoring a script; you're managing a digital employee.
This brings up critical security questions, especially around the agent's identity. As I explored in a previous post on Non-Human Identity Lifecycle Management, securing and managing the permissions of these autonomous agents is a completely new and vital discipline.
Conclusion: Stop Building Better Bots, Start Cultivating Responsible Agents
The RPA community is standing at a crossroads. They can continue to sharpen their tools for a world of predictable, scripted tasks, or they can embrace the messy, ambiguous, and unbelievably powerful world of autonomous agency.
Focusing on how Agentic AI can execute existing workflows faster is a failure of imagination. The real opportunity is to govern systems that can achieve goals we can't manually micro-manage.
The future doesn't belong to the companies that build the best bots; it belongs to the ones that learn how to cultivate the most responsible, effective, and well-governed agents.
Recommended Watch
π¬ Thoughts? Share in the comments below!
Comments
Post a Comment